Continuous Assessment Subcommittee Minutes
for the Year 2000
| October 25, 2000 | September 13, 2000 |
![]()
|
Subcommittee of the Groundwater Citizens Advisory Committee NOTICE OF MEETING WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 25, 2000 AT 5:00 P.M. COURTHOUSE
ANNEX, CONFERENCE
ROOM 5 1.
Call
to Order 2.
Approval
of the September 13, 2000 Minutes 3.
Communications
(10 minutes) a.
Member Reports on Access To and Success With the Web Board b.
“Thumbs Up” or “Thumbs Down” on the Web Board c.
Setting the “How To” for Future Communications Between
Meetings 4.
Long
Term Monitoring and Assessment Objectives – Discussion (10 minutes) 5.
Starting
Objectives – Compilation of Lists from Members and Discussion (25
minutes) 6.
Goals
and Assignments for Next Meeting (5 minutes) 7.
Agenda
Items for Next Meeting (5 minutes) 8.
Adjourn |
![]()
|
CONTINUOUS
ASSESSMENT
Subcommittee of the
Groundwater Citizens Advisory Committee NOTICE
OF MEETING WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 2000
AT 5:00 P.M. COURTHOUSE ANNEX |
|
Agenda 1.
Call
to Order 2.
Introductions
(5 minutes.) 3.
Our
Mission (5 minutes.) 4.
Long-term
Goals (e.g., Maintain an annually updated internet accessible database)
(15 minutes) 5.
Starting
Objectives (e.g., Establish
the status of existing information) and Assignments (20 minutes) 6.
Communications
(snail mail, email, webboard, etc.) (10
minutes) 7.
Future Meetings and Agenda Items
(5 minutes) 8.
Adjourn
|
Minutes: Continuous Assessment Subcommittee Meeting 9-13-2000Submitted
by Ray Schmidt Present:
Steve Bradley, Brian Kozlowski, Dave Mechenich, Ray Schmidt, Joel Giraud,
Rick Zahn, Fred Bailey Meetings
will be kept to one hour. Work
will be done outside of meetings. We
can email each other between meetings. Bryant
described the function of Citizens Advisory Committee and its
Subcommittees. The groundwater website has our subcommittee mission
listed, along with those of the other subcommittees.
We discussed our subcommittee mission, “To design and implement
long term monitoring and assessment plan for groundwater quality and
quantity”. We expect
to spend one to two years for initial design and implementation. Discussed
Long Term Goals.
Regarding databases: DNR (GRIN), Environmental Task Force Lab,
DATCP, State Lab of Hygiene, Portage County - info is in different
formats, no standard parameters exist.
Locational reliability of much of the older data is suspect. Need
to know depth of wells to know which portion of the aquifer is being
sampled. Confidentiality of
private well water quality data needs to be considered.
Monitoring
and assessment can use data from monitoring wells, private wells,
municipal wells. Stora Enso (fka
Consolidated Papers) has seven years of data from wells surrounding sludge
landspreading sites, but it’s all confidential. Suggestion:
How about tying into education system.
Have students find out info about their families’ private wells,
and any known quality/quantity problems. Assignment
for next meeting:
Think about long term monitoring and assessment needs, i.e.
database needs, need for continuous monitoring (not just spotty,
project based). Need to
define data gaps, and impediments to access to available data. Don’t
limit ourselves to what we think might be possible.
Determine what we would like to do and then determine what means we
need to employ to get it done. Members
will bring bulleted lists of starting objectives. Dave
and Ray will provide descriptions of existing databases available. Each member will put something on the webboard on the
groundwater website (http//www.uwsp.edu/water/portage/) to evaluate its
potential for discussion purposes. Meetings
will be monthly.
Work products will be due one week before meetings. Next
Meeting:
October 11, 5:00 PM, Courthouse Annex |
![]()
agencies | laws & regulations |
PCGCAC |
groundwater management
plan